Statements (52)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
1975-12-10
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
appealed from lower court
No. 74-1680 involved search of premises |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
evidence suppression
upheld individual rights majority opinion favored Janis ruled in favor of Janis |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
important for civil rights
important for Fourth Amendment interpretation |
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
shaped future legal standards
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun
concerns about law enforcement |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
1976-06-29
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
landmark case in U. S. law
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Janis
|
| gptkbp:impact |
civil liberties
law enforcement practices law enforcement training |
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
precedent cases
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States
Janis |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
425 U. S. 501
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
reviewed by Supreme Court |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Fourth Amendment jurisprudence
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
constitutional protections
reaffirmed exclusionary rule |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
unreasonable search and seizure
Fourth Amendment rights |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
reversed lower court decision
evidence deemed inadmissible |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:lawyer
constitutional law |
| gptkbp:legislation |
due process
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
evidence obtained illegally was inadmissible
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
exclusionary rule
influenced future rulings evidence admissibility standards |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Illinois_v._Gates
gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio |
| gptkbp:related_to |
search and seizure
|
| gptkbp:significance |
clarified application of the exclusionary rule
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Schroeder_v._United_States
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|