Statements (55)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
75-155
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
U.S._1976
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
1975
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
1976
unanimous |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Hayden
|
| gptkbp:impact |
law_enforcement_practices
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Justice_Byron_White gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens gptkb:Justice_Thurgood_Marshall gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr. gptkb:Justice_Lewis_F._Powell_Jr. gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist Justice Harry Blackmun |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
reasonable expectation of privacy
Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:U.S._Attorney_General
defense attorney |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
public policy
civil rights legal education constitutional law individual rights judicial review legal reforms case law civil liberties due process legal standards law enforcement training constitutional amendments criminal procedure government surveillance privacy rights exclusionary rule legal precedent court rulings judicial activism legal ethics legal analysis judicial precedent law and society law enforcement accountability constitutional protections evidence admissibility court interpretation search warrant requirements search and seizure standards Fourth_Amendment_jurisprudence |
| gptkbp:outcome |
search and seizure ruling
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
established_Fourth_Amendment_interpretations
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Katz_v._United_States
|