Properties (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
04-1036
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
reversal of lower court decision
precedent for future cases impact on judicial decisions details of the judicial outcome details_of_the_Supreme_Court's_ruling |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal appeal
04-1036 details of the judicial review process |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
549 U.S. 59
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
November 1, 2005
warrantless searches |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
unanimous decision influence_on_Fourth_Amendment_interpretation |
| gptkbp:date |
January 10, 2006
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
2006 |
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
history of the legal proceedings
appeal from lower court |
| gptkbp:homeGround |
background of the case
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Gonzalez
|
| gptkbp:impact |
law_enforcement_practices
|
| gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:United_States
Gonzalez |
| gptkbp:judges |
upheld constitutional protections
Supreme_Court_review Supreme_Court_ruling Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg's_dissent |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
criminal law
federal law exclusionary rule public defender reaffirmation of rights constitutionality of search |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
arguments presented by both sides
involves search and seizure clarification of legal standards summary of legal findings analysis of search warrant requirements analysis of the judicial reasoning relevant to criminal procedure significance of the judicial decision judgment_delivered_by_the_Supreme_Court |
| gptkbp:outcome |
reversed
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
Justice_Scalia's_opinion
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
implications for law enforcement
context of the legal issues involved |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Fourth Amendment
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on search and seizure laws
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
November 1, 2005
|
| gptkbp:stadium |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit
|
| gptkbp:team |
significance in legal history
precedent set by the case arguments made during the case impact on future legal interpretations principles established by the ruling |