United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:citation	351 U.S. 377
gptkbp:country	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date	1956-06-11
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:defendant	gptkb:E._I._du_Pont_de_Nemours_&_Co.
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter gptkb:Justice_John_Marshall_Harlan_II
gptkbp:fullName	gptkb:United_States_v._E._I._du_Pont_de_Nemours_&_Co.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.
gptkbp:joinedBy	gptkb:Justice_Harold_Hitz_Burton gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas gptkb:Justice_Sherman_Minton gptkb:Justice_Tom_C._Clark Chief Justice Earl Warren
gptkbp:legalHolding	Cellophane market was broader than just cellophane Defining relevant market is crucial in antitrust cases Market power must be assessed in context of competition
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Stanley_Forman_Reed
gptkbp:nickname	Cellophane case
gptkbp:plaintiff	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Sherman_Antitrust_Act market definition
gptkbp:subject	antitrust law monopoly
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:DuPont_antitrust_litigation
gptkbp:bfsLayer	6