Statements (83)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:amended_by |
Fourth Amendment.
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
00-5913
arguments presented in court. criminal case. details of the case proceedings. involved prior arrests. summary of the case. |
| gptkbp:consequences |
impact on future legal cases.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
April 29, 2002 |
| gptkbp:has_impact_on |
affects how consent is obtained in searches.
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
November 13, 2001
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Drayton
|
| gptkbp:impact |
law enforcement practices.
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
previous rulings on consent searches.
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
536 U. S. 194
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
United States, Drayton.
|
| gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
reasonable person standard.
|
| gptkbp:judging_criteria |
affirmed.
judgment rendered by the court. |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
reviewed by the Supreme Court.
summary of the judicial impact. details of the judicial findings. details of the judicial review. findings made by the court. summary of the judicial findings details. summary of the judicial findings. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Fourth Amendment rights
influenced future cases. details of the legal arguments. details of the legal context. summary of the legal arguments. summary of the legal context. summary of the legal outcome details. details of the judicial impact. summary of the legal context details. summary of the legal impact. arguments made by both sides. consent vs. coercion. context of the legal issues. details of the legal analysis. details of the legal impact. impact on judicial practices. legal principles established. search and seizure law. summary of the legal arguments details. voluntary consent. |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
summary of the legal context details.
summary of the legal significance. analysis of consent. detailed summary of the legal outcome. |
| gptkbp:material |
background of the case.
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Florida_v._Bostick
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
majority opinion.
important for civil liberties. summary of the legal outcome. Court ruled that police officers did not need to inform passengers of their right to refuse consent to search. affirmed lower court ruling. analysis of the court's reasoning. analysis of the outcome. details of the court's decision. details of the legal significance. details of the search upheld. findings on consent. implications for passenger rights. outcome of the legal proceedings. relevant to Fourth Amendment discussions. ruled in favor of law enforcement. significance in legal history. upheld police search. upheld the search. |
| gptkbp:precedent |
details of the legal precedent.
established guidelines for police conduct. precedent set by the ruling. subsequent cases involving consent searches. summary of the legal precedent. |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dissenting opinion. |
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified the standards for consent searches in public transportation.
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Spinelli_v._United_States
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|