Properties (51)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Search upheld
Constitutional search upheld Critiques from civil rights advocates Impact on judicial interpretations Influenced legal publications Influenced public perception of police searches Influenced state laws on searches Outcomes for future cases Public opinion on police searches Bostick's_consent_was_valid |
gptkbp:caseTypes |
Criminal law
89-1792 Future implications for law enforcement |
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
Affirmed lower court's ruling Legal journals and articles |
gptkbp:date |
1991-06-10
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
gptkbp:filedIn |
1990-11-13
|
gptkbp:firstClaim |
Influenced future consent search cases
|
gptkbp:hasLegalEvent |
Taught in law schools
|
gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Context of 1990s policing
Appealed_from_Florida_Supreme_Court |
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Florida v. Bostick
|
gptkbp:impact |
Law_enforcement_practices
|
gptkbp:involved |
Bostick,_Florida_law_enforcement
|
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
Supreme_Court_review |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Florida
|
gptkbp:legalStatus |
Search and seizure law
Clarified consent in searches Set standards for consent searches Fourth_Amendment_rights |
gptkbp:localLegends |
Referenced in legal scholarship
|
gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
Covered in legal media
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
501 U.S. 429
Arguments on consent validity Examined police authority Justices_of_the_Supreme_Court Relevant_to_Fourth_Amendment_discussions |
gptkbp:outcome |
Search was deemed constitutional
|
gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor
|
gptkbp:precedent |
Consent searches
Guidelines for police conduct |
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
Implications for civil liberties Voluntariness of consent |
gptkbp:significance |
Addressed voluntary consent in police encounters
|
gptkbp:team |
Debate on consent and coercion
Fourth_Amendment_framework |