United States v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company
GPTKB entity
Statements (44)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
No. 1
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
311 U.S. 70
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
February 3, 1941 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
January 6, 1941
|
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
economic policies
regulatory frameworks business practices consumer protection laws legal precedents market dynamics transportation regulations business competition antitrust enforcement court interpretations railroad mergers |
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Great Depression
railroad industry decline New_Deal_policies |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company
|
| gptkbp:impact |
railroad industry regulations
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Delaware,_Lackawanna_and_Western_Railroad_Company |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Murphy
gptkb:Justice_Jackson affirmed lower court's decision |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
public interest
market competition antitrust laws government intervention economic regulation New Deal era legislation important antitrust ruling monopolistic_practices |
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruling_in_favor_of_United_States
|
| gptkbp:party |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Delaware,_Lackawanna_and_Western_Railroad_Company |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future antitrust cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Pennsylvania_Railroad_Company
gptkb:United_States_v._Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Company |
| gptkbp:year |
1941
|