Statements (90)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
March 1875
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Often studied in law schools.
Frequently discussed in legal forums. Relevant to discussions on civil liberties. Analysis of the case's impact on civil rights. Criticized for undermining civil rights. Examined limits of federal intervention Implications for federal civil rights enforcement. |
| gptkbp:case_documentation_link |
Available in legal databases.
|
| gptkbp:case_historical_context_analysis |
Analysis of the historical context.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_impact_analysis |
Analysis of the judicial impact of the case.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_impact_summary |
Summary of the judicial impact.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_outcome_analysis |
Analysis of the judicial outcome.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_outcome_summary |
Summary of the judicial outcome.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_philosophy |
Reflects judicial philosophy of the time.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_philosophy_analysis |
Analysis of the judicial philosophy reflected.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_philosophy_summary |
Summary of the judicial philosophy.
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_review_outcome_summary |
Summary of the judicial review outcome.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_analysis_summary |
Summary of the legal analysis.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_context_analysis |
Analysis of the legal context of the case.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_interpretation |
Interpreted the Enforcement Act.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_interpretation_analysis |
Analysis of the legal interpretation provided.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_interpretation_summary |
Summary of the legal interpretation.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_precedent_analysis |
Analysis of the legal precedent set.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_precedent_summary |
Summary of the legal precedent.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_significance_analysis |
Analysis of the legal significance of the case.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_significance_summary |
Summary of the legal significance.
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
Not applicable
Available in legal archives. |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Reversed lower court ruling
Majority opinion emphasized state sovereignty. Defendants' actions not punishable under federal law Defendants not held liable Influenced later civil rights cases. Long-term effects on civil rights enforcement No federal prosecution for civil rights violations |
| gptkbp:case_relevance_today |
Still relevant in contemporary civil rights discussions.
|
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Influenced future civil rights legislation
Context of racial tensions in the South. Historical significance in civil rights history. Significant in the context of civil rights. |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Criminal case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1876 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Joseph_P._Bradley
|
| gptkbp:has_historical_significance |
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Movement
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Post-Civil War America
|
| gptkbp:historical_event |
Reconstruction Era violence
|
| gptkbp:historical_impact |
Setback for federal civil rights enforcement
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Impact on Reconstruction policies
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Cruikshank
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Reconstruction Era legislation
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1875
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
United States and Cruikshank
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
92 U. S. 542
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
Analysis of the outcome of judicial review. Outcome of judicial review limited federal power. |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legacy |
Legacy of limited federal power.
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Post-Reconstruction legal environment.
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Summary of the legal framework.
Analysis of the legal framework established. Judicial impact on civil rights enforcement. Judicial outcome favored state authority. Part of the legal framework of the Reconstruction Era. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Second Amendment rights
Federal vs. state authority |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Limited federal enforcement of civil rights
Legal outcome limited federal authority. |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
State action doctrine
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Legal analysis of the case's implications.
|
| gptkbp:material |
Originated from the Colfax Massacre.
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Defendants were acquitted
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Civil Rights cases
Set a legal precedent for future cases. Limited scope of federal power |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_William_Strong
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:United_States_v._Harris
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Colfax_Massacre
|
| gptkbp:related_to_amendments |
gptkb:14th_Amendment
|
| gptkbp:related_to_civil_rights |
Voting Rights
|
| gptkbp:related_to_judicial_philosophy |
Judicial restraint
|
| gptkbp:related_to_violence |
Racial violence in the South
|
| gptkbp:significance |
First case interpreting the Enforcement Act of 1870
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_Salmon_P._Chase
gptkb:Joseph_Story |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|