Statements (66)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
analyzed by legal scholars
discussed in law reviews influenced law enforcement practices examined in constitutional law courses cited in legal arguments used in moot court competitions analyzed in legal textbooks referenced in legal precedents analyzed in media articles cited in academic papers analyzed in civil rights discussions analyzed in constitutional debates analyzed in surveillance law discussions cited in Supreme Court briefs cited in constitutional law cases cited in law school curricula debated in civil liberties forums discussed in ethics debates discussed in law enforcement training. discussed in privacy advocacy groups discussed in public interest law debates discussed in public policy discussions examined in Supreme Court history studies examined in judicial opinions referenced in legal commentaries referenced in legal ethics discussions referenced in legal history texts referenced in privacy law discussions used in legal training materials |
| gptkbp:case_number |
85-1503
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
affirmed lower court ruling
Ciraolo's conviction upheld majority found no reasonable expectation of privacy majority opinion by Justice Powell set precedent for aerial surveillance cases |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
landmark case in privacy rights
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
influenced future surveillance cases
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
1986-04-21 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
dissent argued for stronger privacy protections
dissent by Justice Brennan |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
1986-04-21
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Ciraolo
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced privacy law debates
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States
Ciraolo |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
476 U. S. 207
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Fourth Amendment jurisprudence
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Fourth Amendment rights
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
public exposure diminishes privacy expectations
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
government attorney
Ciraolo's attorney |
| gptkbp:outcome |
warrantless aerial surveillance is constitutional
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
privacy expectations in public view
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
5-4
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Florida_v._Riley
gptkb:California_v._Ciraolo gptkb:Katz_v._United_States |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on aerial surveillance laws
|
| gptkbp:sound |
1985-11-12
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Skinner_v._Railway_Labor_Executives'_Association
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|