United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
GPTKB entity
Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
influenced public policy
limited police powers reduced racial profiling |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal case
No. 73-59 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
422 U.S. 873
|
| gptkbp:court |
unconstitutional stop
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
April 30, 1975 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
gptkb:John_J._Gibbons
|
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
police training programs
|
| gptkbp:hasAuthorityOver |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
1970s immigration policy
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
part of legal history regarding immigration
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
traffic stop incident
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
|
| gptkbp:impact |
immigration law enforcement
law_enforcement_practices |
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
civil rights movement
|
| gptkbp:inspiredBy |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
|
| gptkbp:involves |
border_patrol_agents
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Justice Harry Blackmun
reaffirmed civil liberties Supreme_Court_review |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
reasonable suspicion Fourth_Amendment_rights Fourth_Amendment_jurisprudence |
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
Immigration and Nationality Act
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
legal scholars
landmark case unconstitutional search racial profiling concerns involves_Mexican_nationals |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court_ruled_against_the_government
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
The stop was unconstitutional
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent immigration enforcement cases
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
controversial ruling
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
context of immigration enforcement |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
racial profiling
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Established standards for vehicle stops based on ethnicity
|
| gptkbp:team |
protection against unreasonable searches
upheld constitutional protections influenced future rulings arguments against racial profiling important civil rights case shaped immigration enforcement policies |