United States v. Martinez-Fuerte
GPTKB entity
Statements (53)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:William_J._Brennan
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal law
No. 75-2 details of the case are frequently cited involved prior arrests at checkpoints |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Martinez-Fuerte |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
June 30, 1976 |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
June 30, 1976
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
April 20, 1976
reasonableness of stops at checkpoints |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Martinez-Fuerte
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced later cases regarding police stops
influenced law enforcement practices at checkpoints |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
428 U. S. 543
referenced in legal arguments regarding immigration enforcement. |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
reviewed by the Supreme Court
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:government_agency
Fourth Amendment rights debate over civil liberties vs. national security judicial outcome influenced future cases part of the legal framework for immigration enforcement stop and search without warrant under certain conditions |
| gptkbp:legislation |
reasonable suspicion
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:United_States_v._Brignoni-Ponce
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
5-4 ruling
affirmed lower court's decision analyzed in legal studies often studied in law schools impact on civil rights discussions upheld the constitutionality of immigration checkpoints decision affected law enforcement policies majority opinion supported by four justices upheld the use of checkpoints for immigration enforcement relevant to discussions on immigration policy ruling favored government interests set a precedent for future immigration law cases significant for Fourth Amendment interpretation upheld immigration enforcement practices upheld the legality of immigration checkpoints |
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent immigration enforcement cases
established legal precedent for checkpoint stops established standards for immigration checkpoints |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas argued against the majority's reasoning |
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
discussed in law journals
|
| gptkbp:significance |
important for Fourth Amendment jurisprudence
addressed the balance between individual rights and government interests |