United States v. Antonio J. Morrison, et al.

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate	January 11, 2000
gptkbp:citation	gptkb:529_U.S._598
gptkbp:constitutionalClause	gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment Commerce Clause
gptkbp:date	May 15, 2000
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:defendant	gptkb:Antonio_J._Morrison gptkb:James_Crawford
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:David_Souter gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:docketNumber	99-5
gptkbp:fullName	gptkb:United_States_v._Antonio_J._Morrison,_et_al.
gptkbp:heldBy	Congress lacked authority under the Commerce Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment to enact the civil remedy provision of the Violence Against Women Act.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	United States v. Antonio J. Morrison, et al.
gptkbp:joinedBy	gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor gptkb:Antonin_Scalia gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkbp:overruledBy	Violence Against Women Act civil remedy provision
gptkbp:plaintiff	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:United_States_v._Lopez
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:Violence_Against_Women_Act
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:United_States_v._Morrison
gptkbp:bfsLayer	6