Statements (116)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:aftermath |
increased competition
|
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_District_of_Columbia_Circuit
no appeal |
| gptkbp:area |
antitrust law
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
market dominance
|
| gptkbp:at&_t's_response |
compliance with decree
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
still relevant today
business law courses business strategy analysis |
| gptkbp:case_number |
court transcripts
Civil Action No. 74-1698 |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:monarchy
influence on public policy increased regulatory scrutiny telecom deregulation favorable to the government global antitrust policies increased competition in telecommunications restructuring of the telecom industry AT& T's breakup into seven regional companies |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
landmark antitrust case
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
civil case
antitrust case |
| gptkbp:consequences |
future mergers and acquisitions
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:District_Court_for_the_District_of_Columbia
gptkb:AT&_T gptkb:United_States gptkb:AT&_T_Corporation |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
gptkb:United_States_District_Court |
| gptkbp:duration |
8 years
|
| gptkbp:economic_impact |
reduced prices
lower consumer prices |
| gptkbp:economic_policy |
regulatory reform
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
gptkb:1982
January 8, 1982 |
| gptkbp:historical_context |
1970s telecommunications landscape
deregulation era |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. AT& T
|
| gptkbp:impact |
market competition
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
public policy
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Bell_System
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:AT&_T_Inc.
gptkb:United_States_Department_of_Justice |
| gptkbp:is_a_basis_for |
antitrust laws
|
| gptkbp:is_a_moment_of |
breakup of monopoly
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
often cited in legal literature
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Harold_Leventhal
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
divestiture of local exchange carriers
divestiture of subsidiaries |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
litigation strategy
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Police_Department
gptkb:Wilmer_Cutler_Pickering_Hale_and_Dorr monopoly power |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Clayton_Act
gptkb:Sherman_Act gptkb:Communications_Act_of_1934 |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive coverage
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
breakup of AT& T
|
| gptkbp:plaintiff_argument |
anti-competitive practices
|
| gptkbp:political_position |
regulatory oversight
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
antitrust litigation
antitrust enforcement future antitrust cases |
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
mixed opinions
support for competition |
| gptkbp:publication_year |
gptkb:1974
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:MCI_Telecommunications_Corp._v._AT&_T
gptkb:United_States_v._Microsoft |
| gptkbp:related_concept |
gptkb:competition
gptkb:economic_analysis gptkb:Monopoly gptkb:economic_policies gptkb:strategy gptkb:Ethics gptkb:business gptkb:government_policies gptkb:legal_case gptkb:organization gptkb:regulations regulatory compliance competitive advantage consumer protection corporate governance legal compliance public interest consumer choice judicial review service quality market share market entry market dynamics economic regulation telecommunications policy market forces market regulation network access legal analysis market structure business environment economic competition antitrust enforcement business regulation telecom regulation economic impact analysis |
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Telecommunications_Act_of_1996
|
| gptkbp:result |
dissolution of AT& T's monopoly
|
| gptkbp:resulted_in |
formation of regional Bell operating companies
|
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
antitrust theory
|
| gptkbp:significance |
telecommunications industry
impact on telecommunications industry |
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:1982
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:AT&_T
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|