Statements (114)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:AT&_T
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_District_of_Columbia_Circuit
no appeal |
| gptkbp:aftermath |
increased competition
|
| gptkbp:area |
antitrust law
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
court transcripts
civil case antitrust case Civil Action No. 74-1698 |
| gptkbp:consequences |
future mergers and acquisitions
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:District_Court_for_the_District_of_Columbia
gptkb:AT&_T gptkb:United_States gptkb:AT&_T_Corporation anti-competitive practices |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
gptkb:legal_case |
| gptkbp:diplomatic_relations |
regulatory reform
|
| gptkbp:duration |
8 years
|
| gptkbp:economic_impact |
reduced prices
lower consumer prices |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
gptkb:1982
January 8, 1982 |
| gptkbp:historical_context |
1970s telecommunications landscape
deregulation era |
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
market dominance
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. AT& T
|
| gptkbp:impact |
market competition
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
public policy
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:AT&_T_Inc.
gptkb:United_States_Department_of_Justice |
| gptkbp:is_a_basis_for |
antitrust laws
|
| gptkbp:is_a_moment_of |
breakup of monopoly
|
| gptkbp:is_atype_of |
compliance with decree
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
often cited in legal literature
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Bell_System
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Harold_Leventhal
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
litigation strategy
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Police_Department
gptkb:Wilmer_Cutler_Pickering_Hale_and_Dorr monopoly power |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Clayton_Act
gptkb:Sherman_Act gptkb:Communications_Act_of_1934 |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive coverage
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:MCI_Telecommunications_Corp._v._AT&_T
gptkb:United_States_v._Microsoft |
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:document
influence on public policy still relevant today landmark antitrust case increased regulatory scrutiny divestiture of local exchange carriers telecom deregulation business law courses divestiture of subsidiaries favorable to the government global antitrust policies increased competition in telecommunications breakup of AT& T business strategy analysis restructuring of the telecom industry AT& T's breakup into seven regional companies |
| gptkbp:political_position |
regulatory oversight
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
antitrust litigation
antitrust enforcement future antitrust cases |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
mixed opinions
support for competition |
| gptkbp:published_year |
gptkb:1974
|
| gptkbp:related_concept |
gptkb:government_agency
gptkb:legislation gptkb:award gptkb:financial_services_company gptkb:High_School gptkb:sports_event gptkb:battle gptkb:municipality gptkb:legal_case regulatory compliance competitive advantage consumer protection corporate governance legal compliance public interest consumer choice judicial review service quality market share market entry market dynamics economic regulation telecommunications policy market forces market regulation network access legal analysis market structure business environment economic competition antitrust enforcement business regulation telecom regulation economic impact analysis |
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Telecommunications_Act_of_1996
|
| gptkbp:result |
dissolution of AT& T's monopoly
|
| gptkbp:resulted_in |
formation of regional Bell operating companies
|
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
antitrust theory
|
| gptkbp:significance |
telecommunications industry
impact on telecommunications industry |
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:1982
|