Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer

GPTKB entity

Statements (43)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:caseOutcome Set a precedent for future cases
Influenced public policy debates
Challenged state funding restrictions
Clarified state funding eligibility
Encouraged legal challenges to similar laws
Expanded interpretation of religious freedom
Highlighted issues of discrimination in funding
Promoted discussions on church-state separation
Reinforced the Free Exercise Clause
Strengthened legal standing for religious entities
gptkbp:caseTypes Constitutional law
gptkbp:citedBy 582 U.S. 149 (2017)
gptkbp:controversy Separation of church and state
Discrimination against religious organizations
gptkbp:court gptkb:Trinity_Lutheran_Church
gptkb:C._J._Comer
5-4 ruling
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 26, 2017
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer
gptkbp:impact Influenced state funding policies
gptkbp:isInvolvedIn Scrap tire surface material program
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkbp:jurisdiction gptkb:United_States_federal_jurisdiction
gptkbp:legalStatus gptkb:Becket_Fund_for_Religious_Liberty
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
Religious freedom
Establishment Clause
Free Exercise Clause
Funding denied based on religious status
gptkbp:notableEvent gptkb:First_Amendment
gptkb:Missouri_Constitution
gptkbp:notableFeature Impact on church-state relations
gptkbp:outcome The_Court_ruled_in_favor_of_Trinity_Lutheran_Church
gptkbp:politicalParty gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
gptkbp:precedent Religious institutions can receive public funds
gptkbp:publicAccess Mixed reactions from religious groups
Concerns from secular organizations
Support from conservative organizations
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Lemon_v._Kurtzman
gptkb:Everson_v._Board_of_Education
gptkbp:state gptkb:Missouri_Department_of_Natural_Resources