gptkbp:instanceOf
|
High Court of Australia case
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:[2019]_HCA_27
|
gptkbp:co-plaintiff
|
gptkb:Daniel_Love
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:Australia
|
gptkbp:date
|
2019-10-16
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Gageler_J
gptkb:Keane_J
gptkb:Kiefel_CJ
|
gptkbp:externalLink
|
https://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/case_b43-2018
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Love_v_Commonwealth;_Thoms_v_Commonwealth
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Thoms v Commonwealth
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
status of Aboriginal Australians under the Constitution
citizenship and constitutional law
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Bell_J
gptkb:Edelman_J
gptkb:Gordon_J
gptkb:Nettle_J
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:Brendan_Thoms
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Love_v_Commonwealth
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Commonwealth_of_Australia
|
gptkbp:result
|
Aboriginal Australians cannot be considered aliens under section 51(xix) of the Constitution
|
gptkbp:significance
|
first time High Court recognised a category of people who cannot be considered aliens
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:constitutional_law
immigration law
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Love_v_Commonwealth
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|