Statements (24)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
High Court of Australia decision
|
| gptkbp:application |
Comcare
|
| gptkbp:citation |
gptkb:[2019]_HCA_27
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:Australia
|
| gptkbp:date |
2019-06-19
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
Comcare v Banerji
|
| gptkbp:fullTitle |
Comcare v Banerji [2019] HCA 27
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
[2019] HCA 27
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Bell_J
gptkb:Edelman_J gptkb:Gageler_J gptkb:Gordon_J gptkb:Keane_J gptkb:Kiefel_CJ gptkb:Nettle_J gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia |
| gptkbp:legalSubject |
gptkb:constitutional_law
gptkb:public_administration freedom of political communication |
| gptkbp:plotSummary |
The case considered whether the termination of a public servant for anonymous tweets critical of government policy breached the implied freedom of political communication.
|
| gptkbp:response |
Michaela Banerji
|
| gptkbp:result |
appeal dismissed
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Thoms_v_Commonwealth
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|