Statements (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
November 18, 1969
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Analyzed for its implications on state law
Implications for state cooperation Relevant to state financial disputes |
| gptkbp:case_number |
Documented in legal archives
Originated from a dispute over unclaimed funds |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Resolved
Unanimous decision Funds were to be distributed to New Jersey Majority opinion favored New Jersey New Jersey awarded funds New Jersey received funds from Texas Ruling favored equitable distribution of funds Strengthened state claims in disputes |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Influenced future interstate compact agreements
Significant for state legal relations |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Interstate dispute case
|
| gptkbp:court |
Original jurisdiction case
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
January 21, 1970 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun
Dissent argued for Texas's position |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
No. 10, Original
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
gptkb:1970
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Texas v. New Jersey
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Interstate relations
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:State_of_New_Jersey
gptkb:State_of_Texas |
| gptkbp:is_a_basis_for |
Based on constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
385 U. S. 1
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
Judgment favored New Jersey's claim
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
Reviewed under original jurisdiction |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
State sovereignty issues
Context of state versus state disputes. |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Established precedent for future cases
Impact on future interstate legal cases Interstate compact law Supreme Court's authority over states |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Constitutional interpretation
Interstate disputes |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Legal outcome favored New Jersey's position
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
gptkb:Full_Faith_and_Credit_Clause
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Attorney_General_of_Texas
gptkb:Attorney_General_of_New_Jersey |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court ruled in favor of New Jersey
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Interstate compact disputes
Precedent for future interstate disputes Set a standard for interstate financial disputes |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:New_Jersey_v._New_York
Referenced in later interstate disputes |
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified state obligations under the Constitution
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Texas_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|