Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:citation	446 U.S. 55
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Lewis_F._Powell_Jr. gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens gptkb:Warren_E._Burger gptkb:William_H._Rehnquist
gptkbp:date	1980
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Byron_White gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr. gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
gptkbp:effect	Led to 1982 amendment of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act
gptkbp:fullName	City of Mobile v. Bolden
gptkbp:heldBy	Proof of discriminatory intent is required to establish a violation of the Fifteenth Amendment or Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
gptkbp:judge	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:legalSubject	gptkb:Fifteenth_Amendment gptkb:Voting_Rights_Act
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Potter_Stewart
gptkbp:overruledBy	Thornburg v. Gingles
gptkbp:predecessor	Thornburg v. Gingles
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Mobile,_Alabama at-large voting system
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Voting_Rights_Act_Amendments_of_1982
gptkbp:bfsLayer	7
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden