Statements (75)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
gptkb:David_Strickland
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
No. 82-155
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'_Connor
reversed lower court's decision |
| gptkbp:case_types |
constitutional law case
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1984-05-14 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_William_Rehnquist gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun |
| gptkbp:first_prong |
performance of the attorney was deficient
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Strickland v. Washington
|
| gptkbp:impact |
criminal defense law
legal standards for defense attorneys influenced legal standards in various jurisdictions |
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
gptkb:Sixth_Amendment_of_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkb:Sixth_Amendment |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:State_of_Washington
gptkb:David_Strickland |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
466 U. S. 668
|
| gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
performance and prejudice standard
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:Justice_Lewis_F._Powell_Jr. gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'_Connor gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:legal_frameworks
gptkb:Defense gptkb:legal_case judicial review due process rights fair trial rights legal precedents legal standards court procedures criminal procedure legal interpretations criminal appeals right to counsel court rulings defendant's rights legal ethics client representation criminal defense rights trial strategy constitutional protections post-conviction relief criminal law principles legal doctrines judicial standards judicial principles Sixth Amendment rights ineffective assistance claims lawyer's duty |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
ineffective assistance of counsel
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
affirmed the importance of effective legal representation
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
right to effective assistance of counsel
two-pronged test for ineffective assistance |
| gptkbp:outcome |
established standard for evaluating claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
reaffirmed the two-pronged test for ineffective assistance of counsel |
| gptkbp:precedent |
criminal defense cases
subsequent cases regarding the right to counsel |
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Wiggins_v._Smith
gptkb:Rompilla_v._Beard gptkb:Lockhart_v._Fretwell gptkb:Hill_v._Lockhart gptkb:Mc_Mann_v._Richardson |
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:responds_to |
gptkb:State_of_Washington
|
| gptkbp:second_prong |
deficiency prejudiced the defense
|
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark decision in U. S. legal history
established the standard for determining whether a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Powell_v._Alabama
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|