Buck v. Davis

GPTKB entity

Statements (35)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate October 5, 2016
gptkbp:category United States Supreme Court cases
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
2017 in United States case law
gptkbp:citation 137 S. Ct. 759
197 L. Ed. 2d 1
580 U.S. ___
gptkbp:date February 22, 2017
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkbp:docketNumber 15-8049
gptkbp:fullName gptkb:Duane_Buck_v._Lorie_Davis,_Director,_Texas_Department_of_Criminal_Justice,_Correctional_Institutions_Division
gptkbp:heldBy The Supreme Court held that Buck’s counsel was constitutionally ineffective for introducing expert testimony that Buck was more likely to be dangerous in the future because he is black.
gptkbp:historicalPeriod gptkb:Buck_v._Stephens,_623_Fed._Appx._668_(5th_Cir._2015)
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Buck v. Davis
gptkbp:location gptkb:Texas
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
Chief Justice John Roberts
gptkbp:petitioner gptkb:Duane_Buck
gptkbp:relatedTo gptkb:Sixth_Amendment
gptkb:Strickland_v._Washington
gptkbp:response gptkb:Lorie_Davis
gptkbp:result Reversed and remanded
gptkbp:significance Clarified standards for ineffective assistance of counsel claims involving racial bias
gptkbp:subject Ineffective assistance of counsel
Racial bias in death penalty cases
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkbp:bfsLayer 6