Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York
GPTKB entity
Statements (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
relevant to ongoing abortion rights discussions
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_context |
context of ongoing legal battles over abortion rights
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
01-1168
originated from New York state courts |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
5-4 ruling upheld lower court's decision balance between free speech and public safety buffer zones upheld in specific contexts focused on public safety concerns shaped legal landscape for protests significant for reproductive health access |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
important for reproductive rights advocacy
important for balancing rights and safety significant for future protest regulations |
| gptkbp:case_types |
civil case
debated free speech versus public safety |
| gptkbp:consequences |
affects future protests
influenced future legal challenges |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 30, 2003 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
concerns about free speech limitations |
| gptkbp:historical_context |
1990s abortion clinic protests
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced state laws on protest zones
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_free_speech |
limits on protest activities
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York
Schenck |
| gptkbp:judged_by |
judgment affirmed by Supreme Court
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
First Amendment jurisprudence
reviewed by Supreme Court justices |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
abortion rights debate
context of abortion rights and protests |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
influenced state and local laws on protests
involves First Amendment interpretation upheld constitutionality of buffer zones upheld lower court's ruling on buffer zones |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
First Amendment rights
focused on First Amendment interpretations |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
buffer zones are constitutional
upheld rights of states to regulate protests |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
time, place, and manner restrictions
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
gptkb:National_Organization_for_Women examined First Amendment protections |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld buffer zones
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
established buffer zone precedent
established legal standards for protests subsequent cases regarding protest regulations established precedent for buffer zones in protests. |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
supports buffer zones as necessary
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
mixed reactions
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Hill_v._Colorado
gptkb:Madsen_v._Women's_Health_Center,_Inc. |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on abortion clinic protests
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Robert_Schenck_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|