|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
January 19, 2000
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:McCullen_v._Coakley
gptkb:530_U.S._703
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 28, 2000
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
98-1856
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Leila_Jeanne_Hill_et_al._v._State_of_Colorado_et_al.
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Colorado statute restricting protest, education, and counseling within 8 feet of a person entering a health care facility does not violate the First Amendment.
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Upheld buffer zones around health care facilities
|
|
gptkbp:legalChallenge
|
gptkb:Colorado_Revised_Statute_§_18-9-122(3)
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:originatedIn
|
gptkb:Colorado
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
Content-neutral regulation of speech
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Madsen_v._Women's_Health_Center,_Inc.
gptkb:Schenck_v._Pro-Choice_Network_of_Western_New_York
|
|
gptkbp:result
|
Colorado law upheld
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:First_Amendment
Freedom of speech
Abortion clinic buffer zones
|
|
gptkbp:votingSystem
|
6-3
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:McCullen_v._Coakley
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Hill v. Colorado
|