|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
526 U.S. 489
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
May 17, 1999
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
98-97
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Saenz,_Director,_California_Department_of_Social_Services_v._Roe_et_al.
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
California's law limiting welfare benefits for new residents violates the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Saenz v. Roe (1999)
|
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
gptkb:Privileges_or_Immunities_Clause
right to travel
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
California statute limiting welfare benefits for new residents
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
right to travel jurisprudence
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
welfare benefits
state residency requirements
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Comity_Clause
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|