Statements (16)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
540 U.S. 389
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
2004-01-13
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:docketNumber |
02-1216
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edwards
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
An investment scheme promising a fixed return can be an investment contract and thus a security under the Securities Act of 1933.
|
| gptkbp:legalSubject |
securities law
|
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Securities_Act_of_1933
gptkb:Howey_Test |
| gptkbp:unanimousDecision |
true
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:SEC_v._W.J._Howey_Co.
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
SEC v. Edwards
|