Statements (63)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
April 21, 2022
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
examines implications for healthcare providers
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_analysis_details |
examines implications for law enforcement
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_arguments_details |
analyzes arguments presented in court
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_outcome_summary_details |
summarizes implications for healthcare law
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
appealed from the Eleventh Circuit
involves allegations of overprescribing |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
reversed and remanded overturned lower court ruling landmark ruling on drug prescriptions redefines legal standards |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
important for legal scholars
important for legal precedents important for medical practitioners |
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal law
focused on statutory interpretation |
| gptkbp:consequences |
affects future prosecutions
affects future drug-related cases affects prosecution of medical professionals |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:docket_number |
20-1410
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
June 27, 2022
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Ruan v. United States
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Dr._Xiulu_Ruan |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
597 U. S. ___ (2022)
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
5-4 decision
reaffirmed rights of defendants |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
reviewed by the Supreme Court reviewed for constitutional issues |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
drug enforcement policy
context of drug enforcement contextualizes within drug policy debates |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
affects judicial interpretations
revised legal interpretations clarifies legal definitions discusses effects on judicial practices interprets federal drug laws |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Controlled Substances Act
debated statutory language establishes burden of proof |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
reinstated jury instructions
revised understanding of intent significant for medical law |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Elizabeth_Prelogar
gptkb:Paul_Clement discusses intent and knowledge |
| gptkbp:material |
involves prescription of controlled substances
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
reversed conviction
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
future drug prescription cases
influences lower courts intent requirement for conviction sets new standards for intent |
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
significant media coverage
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:United_States_v._Moore
|
| gptkbp:relevant_statute |
21 U. S. C. § 841
|
| gptkbp:significance |
clarified standards for prescription drug cases
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Amy_Barrett
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|