|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
Affirmed lower court ruling
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
Criminal case
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 24, 1957
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Roth v. United States
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Obscenity standards
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Samuel_Roth
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
354 U. S. 476 (1957)
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
|
gptkbp:key_concept
|
gptkb:Judicial_review
gptkb:Censorship_laws
gptkb:Constitution
gptkb:First_Amendment
gptkb:Public_interest
gptkb:censorship
gptkb:legal_case
Civil rights
Freedom of speech
Social norms
Civil liberties
Legal history
Constitutional interpretation
Cultural values
Artistic expression
Constitutional rights
Legal challenges
Legal precedent
Artistic freedom
Legal interpretation
Legal standards
Free expression
Moral standards
First Amendment protections
Judicial activism
Community standards
Legal discourse
Sexual content
First Amendment jurisprudence
Legal ramifications
Cultural censorship
Judicial precedent
Public morality
Legal definitions of obscenity
First Amendment debates
Artistic regulation
Obscenity regulation
Obscenity test
Regulation of speech
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
Federal obscenity statute
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
Obscenity laws
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Conviction upheld
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Miller_v._California
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
6-3
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Paris_Adult_Theatre_I_v._Slaton
gptkb:Miller_v._California
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
First Amendment rights
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter
gptkb:Felix_Frankfurter
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|