|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs
|
gptkb:Reno_v._American_Civil_Liberties_Union
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1997-03-19
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:521_U.S._844
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:William_H._Rehnquist
|
|
gptkbp:constitution
|
gptkb:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1997-06-26
|
|
gptkbp:decision
|
landmark decision
|
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
96-511
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Janet_Reno,_Attorney_General_of_the_United_States,_et_al._v._American_Civil_Liberties_Union_et_al.
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The Communications Decency Act's provisions prohibiting indecent and patently offensive communications on the Internet violate the First Amendment.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Reno v. ACLU (1997)
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legalImpact
|
struck down anti-indecency provisions of the Communications Decency Act
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
|
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:Janet_Reno
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
internet free speech cases
|
|
gptkbp:relatedLegislation
|
gptkb:Communications_Decency_Act
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:First_Amendment
gptkb:Communications_Decency_Act
|
|
gptkbp:unanimousDecision
|
yes
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Reno_v._ACLU_(ACLU_v._Reno_II)
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|