|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:application
|
gptkb:Walter_Tessling
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
2004 SCC 67
[2004] 3 S.C.R. 432
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:Canada
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
2004-10-29
|
|
gptkbp:decision
|
Appeal dismissed
|
|
gptkbp:fullTitle
|
gptkb:Her_Majesty_The_Queen_v._Walter_Tessling
|
|
gptkbp:hasKeyword
|
privacy
search and seizure
infrared imaging
Charter rights
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Use of FLIR technology by police does not violate Section 8 of the Charter
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
R v Tessling
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
gptkb:Section_8_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms
unreasonable search and seizure
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Ian_Binnie
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
privacy rights in relation to technology-assisted searches
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Her_Majesty_The_Queen
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
use of FLIR (Forward Looking Infra-Red) technology by police
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases
gptkb:Ian_Binnie
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|