Her Majesty The Queen v. Walter Tessling

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:application	gptkb:Her_Majesty_The_Queen
gptkbp:citation	2004 SCC 67 [2004] 3 S.C.R. 432
gptkbp:country	gptkb:Canada
gptkbp:date	2004-10-29
gptkbp:decision	Appeal allowed
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Her Majesty The Queen v. Walter Tessling
gptkbp:judge	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada gptkb:Justice_Ian_Binnie gptkb:Justice_Louis_LeBel gptkb:Justice_Michel_Bastarache gptkb:Justice_Morris_Fish Justice Beverley McLachlin Justice Frank Iacobucci Justice John Major Justice Louise Arbour Justice Marie Deschamps
gptkbp:legalSubject	gptkb:Section_8_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms unreasonable search and seizure use of FLIR (Forward Looking Infra-Red) technology
gptkbp:plotSummary	The Supreme Court of Canada held that the use of FLIR technology by police did not constitute a search under Section 8 of the Charter.
gptkbp:response	gptkb:Walter_Tessling
gptkbp:unanimousDecision	true
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:R_v_Tessling
gptkbp:bfsLayer	8