Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:R_v._H_(2011)
|
| gptkbp:area |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
appeal allowed
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. M. (A.)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
gptkb:legislation
gptkb:defense_strategies gptkb:legal_reforms public policy appeal processes case law analysis legal precedents court procedures judicial interpretation human rights law law enforcement policies legal ethics judicial accountability judicial training legal scholarship law reform initiatives Canadian criminal justice system public perception of justice victim rights advocacy case law development defendant rights advocacy prosecution practices constitutional law interpretation |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
1998 SCC 27
[1998] 2 S. C. R. 3 |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Arbour
gptkb:Justice_Charron gptkb:Justice_Rothstein gptkb:Justice_Binnie gptkb:Justice_Iacobucci gptkb:Justice_Mc_Lachlin gptkb:Justice_Fish Justice Major |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
fair trial rights
presumption of innocence burden of proof evidence admissibility |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:R_v._Mc_Kinney
gptkb:R_v._Oakes gptkb:R_v._Mc_Donald gptkb:R_v._Mc_Intosh |
| gptkbp:outcome |
retrial ordered
|
| gptkbp:significance |
precedent for similar cases
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:1998
|