Statements (31)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:the_Royal_Courts_of_Justice
|
| gptkbp:area |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal appeal
33980 |
| gptkbp:consequences |
influenced sexual assault laws in Canada
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
2011-03-24
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. H (2011)
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
2011 SCC 25
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
R (appellant)
H (respondent) |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Abella
gptkb:Justice_Karakatsanis gptkb:Justice_Wagner gptkb:Justice_Rothstein gptkb:Justice_Deschamps gptkb:Justice_Fish gptkb:Justice_Le_Bel gptkb:Justice_Moldaver |
| gptkbp:key_issues |
sexual assault
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
reasonable mistake of fact
consent in sexual activity |
| gptkbp:outcome |
appeal allowed
retrial ordered |
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent cases
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:R_v._Ewanchuk
gptkb:R_v._J._A. gptkb:R_v._M._(A.) |
| gptkbp:significance |
clarified consent definition
|