Statements (47)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome |
set a standard for future cases
shaped_Canadian_constitutional_law |
gptkbp:caseTypes |
1985-01-01
criminal case |
gptkbp:citedBy |
[1986] 1 S.C.R. 103
|
gptkbp:court |
unanimous decision
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
gptkbp:gameFeatures |
gptkb:David_Oakes
|
gptkbp:historical_analysis |
extensively analyzed in legal literature
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. Oakes
|
gptkbp:impact |
influenced_the_interpretation_of_rights_in_Canada
|
gptkbp:influencedBy |
international human rights law
|
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_John_Major
gptkb:Justice_Peter_Cory gptkb:Justice_Bertha_Wilson gptkb:Justice_Rosalie_Abella gptkb:Justice_William_McIntyre gptkb:Justice_John_Sopinka gptkb:Justice_Claire_L'Heureux-Dubé none Justice Frank Iacobucci April 10, 1986 Chief_Justice_Brian_Dickson |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Canada
|
gptkbp:legalStatus |
Constitutional law
proportionality test balance between rights and public safety established a precedent for similar cases framework for analyzing rights limitations reaffirmed the importance of individual rights Canadian_legal_system established_the_Oakes_test |
gptkbp:majorIndustry |
Section_1_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms
|
gptkbp:notableEvent |
gptkb:Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
used in law schools
analyzed in various legal journals landmark_case_in_Canadian_law critical_for_understanding_the_Charter |
gptkbp:outcome |
The law was found unconstitutional
|
gptkbp:precedent |
future_cases_involving_the_Charter
|
gptkbp:publicAccess |
widely discussed in media
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:R_v._Edwards
gptkb:R_v._Big_M_Drug_Mart_Ltd. gptkb:R_v._Sharpe |
gptkbp:respondsTo |
The Queen
|
gptkbp:year |
1986
|