|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:affiliated_with
|
gptkb:Equality_California
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:associated_with
|
LGBTQ+ activism
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
invalidated Proposition 8
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
federal recognition of same-sex marriage
state and federal law interaction
|
|
gptkbp:court's_decision_effect
|
influence on public policy
|
|
gptkbp:court's_ruling_affirmed_by
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:court's_ruling_date
|
February 7, 2012
|
|
gptkbp:court's_ruling_impact
|
national marriage equality movement
|
|
gptkbp:court's_ruling_significance
|
affirmation of equality
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:California_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
June 26, 2013
|
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
2000s marriage equality movement
|
|
gptkbp:historical_significance
|
pivotal moment in LGBTQ+ rights
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Proposition 8 case
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
LGBT rights in California
|
|
gptkbp:influenced_by
|
public opinion on same-sex marriage
|
|
gptkbp:initiated_by
|
legal challenge from same-sex couples
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
California voters
|
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gptkb:same-sex_marriage
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_basis_for
|
Equal Protection Clause
|
|
gptkbp:is_challenged_by
|
same-sex couples
|
|
gptkbp:is_debated_in
|
same-sex marriage rights
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_authority_exercised_by
|
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_outcome_date
|
June 26, 2013
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
upheld lower court's decision
California Supreme Court ruling
California Supreme Court review
|
|
gptkbp:legal_challenge_basis
|
fundamental rights
|
|
gptkbp:legal_challenge_initiated_by
|
same-sex couples in California
|
|
gptkbp:legal_challenge_result
|
overturned state ban on same-sex marriage
|
|
gptkbp:legal_challenge_timeline
|
2008 to 2013
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
gptkb:California_courts
state constitutional amendments
marriage equality in California
|
|
gptkbp:legal_implications_for_states
|
same-sex marriage legalization
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
discrimination against same-sex couples
constitutionality of Proposition 8
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
marriage equality restored
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
due process rights
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
gptkb:Lambda_Legal
gptkb:American_Foundation_for_Equal_Rights
|
|
gptkbp:legal_status
|
invalidated by federal courts
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:California_Marriage_Equality_Act
California Family Code
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
extensive national attention
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
impact on future cases
overturned by federal court
|
|
gptkbp:part_of
|
broader civil rights movement
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Obergefell_v._Hodges
federal court rulings on marriage rights
|
|
gptkbp:public_opinion_shift
|
increased support for LGBTQ+ rights
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
shift towards acceptance of same-sex marriage
|
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
protests and support rallies
|
|
gptkbp:public_response_to_ruling
|
celebrations and protests
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Hollingsworth_v._Perry
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
gptkb:Proposition_8
|
|
gptkbp:resulted_in
|
restoration of marriage rights
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
gptkb:cultural_landmark
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:2008
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Ted_Olson
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|