Statements (53)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:author |
gptkb:Justice_John_Marshall_Harlan
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
Important part of American legal history
|
| gptkbp:civic_engagement |
Encouraged civic engagement in civil rights issues
|
| gptkbp:community_impact |
Challenged racial discrimination
|
| gptkbp:context |
Racial segregation laws
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:critical_reception |
Critically analyzed by historians
|
| gptkbp:cultural_impact |
Influenced literature and art
|
| gptkbp:educational_use |
Taught in law schools
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Analyzed in historical context of the 19th century
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
gptkb:Post-Reconstruction_America
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
Debate on civil rights in America
|
| gptkbp:historical_documentation |
Considered a historical document in legal history
|
| gptkbp:historical_interpretation |
Provides historical perspective on race relations in the U. S.
|
| gptkbp:historical_legacy |
Part of the cultural legacy of the civil rights movement
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Foundation for future civil rights legislation
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Plessy v. Ferguson dissent
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced civil rights movement
|
| gptkbp:influence |
Subsequent Supreme Court decisions
Impact on philosophical discussions of justice and equality |
| gptkbp:inspiration |
Inspired activists and lawyers
|
| gptkbp:is_compared_to |
Compared to other dissenting opinions
|
| gptkbp:is_debated_in |
Debate on equality and justice
|
| gptkbp:judicial_legacy |
Part of the judicial legacy of the Supreme Court
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
gptkb:Harlan
Critique of judicial interpretation Critique of the majority opinion's reasoning |
| gptkbp:key_argument |
The Constitution is color-blind.
|
| gptkbp:legacy |
Symbol of dissent against injustice
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Originalism
Influenced future Supreme Court justices Advocated for a broader interpretation of rights Used in legal education to discuss dissenting opinions Part of the legal framework for civil rights advocacy |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Against the validity of segregation
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Dissenting opinion
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Civil rights
|
| gptkbp:modern_relevance |
Continues to be cited in discussions of race and law
|
| gptkbp:notable_quote |
" Our Constitution is color-blind."
|
| gptkbp:philosophy |
Equality under the law
|
| gptkbp:political_impact |
Influenced political discourse on race and equality
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Established precedent for future cases
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Henry_Billings_Brown
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Mixed reactions from the public
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Brown_v._Board_of_Education
|
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Examined in legal studies
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Critique of separate but equal doctrine
|
| gptkbp:social_behavior |
Contributed to social change regarding race relations
|
| gptkbp:social_responsibility |
Related to the concept of social justice
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:1896
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:John_Marshall_Harlan
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|