Statements (71)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
legal errors
defendants appealed the conviction |
| gptkbp:argued_on |
insufficient evidence
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
analyzed by legal scholars
used as a case study in law schools analyzed for legal precedents affects public perception of justice influences legal standards analyzed for implications on justice |
| gptkbp:case_filing_date |
January 10, 2019
|
| gptkbp:case_law_citation |
cited in legal textbooks
|
| gptkbp:case_law_impact |
impact on future rulings
|
| gptkbp:case_law_influence |
influences legal practices.
|
| gptkbp:case_law_reference |
cited in legal arguments
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
multiple defendants
summary of events leading to trial B295123 |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
affirmed lower court's decision
reviewed by legal experts affects sentencing practices affirmed by appellate court majority opinion issued influences future legal cases reviewed for accuracy |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
impact on sentencing guidelines
important for legal education significant in criminal law discussions |
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal appeal
|
| gptkbp:clinical_trial |
jury trial
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
affects future cases
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
ineffective assistance of counsel Zammora and others |
| gptkbp:court's_decision_date |
April 20, 2020
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2020
|
| gptkbp:defendant_demographics |
varied backgrounds
|
| gptkbp:defendant_rights |
right to appeal
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
dissent filed by one judge
|
| gptkbp:duration |
several months
highly complex |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Zammora et al.
|
| gptkbp:impact |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:involved |
criminal charges
|
| gptkbp:is_a_document_that |
court documents filed
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
2020 WL 1234567
|
| gptkbp:judges |
guilty
three-judge panel |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
reviewed by appellate court
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:California_Penal_Code
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
California legal system
appellate review |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
overwhelming evidence
evidence admissibility |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
precedent setting
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
due process
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
case law review defendants represented by counsel publicly appointed attorney |
| gptkbp:material |
details of the crime
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction upheld
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
California criminal law
|
| gptkbp:public_interest |
high-profile case
|
| gptkbp:resolution |
resolved through appellate process
|
| gptkbp:sentence |
5 years imprisonment
|
| gptkbp:sound |
March 15, 2020
|
| gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of |
witness testimonies
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Sleepy_Lagoon_murder_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|