Statements (54)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:argued_on |
unlawful search
|
gptkbp:case_analysis |
law enforcement training
impact on future cases Fourth Amendment jurisprudence search and seizure law California case law |
gptkbp:case_number |
search of vehicle
California criminal law S131202 |
gptkbp:case_outcome |
conviction upheld
affirmed lower court's decision search was lawful consent was given privacy rights in California |
gptkbp:case_significance |
impact on privacy rights
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California_Supreme_Court
People of the State of California Javier Ramirez |
gptkbp:date |
April 2006
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Baxter
|
gptkbp:doctrine |
exclusionary rule
|
gptkbp:effective_date |
June 2006
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Ramirez
|
gptkbp:impact |
law enforcement practices
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
2006 WL 1642704
39 Cal. 4th 1313 |
gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
totality of circumstances
|
gptkbp:judicial_review |
de novo
majority opinion authored by Justice Moreno |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
gptkbp:legal_context |
criminal procedure
|
gptkbp:legal_framework |
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
Fourth Amendment protections |
gptkbp:legal_issue |
search and seizure
consent to search |
gptkbp:legal_outcome |
upheld lower court ruling
|
gptkbp:legal_principle |
reasonable expectation of privacy
|
gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
search warrant requirements |
gptkbp:material |
arrest for drug possession
|
gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed conviction
|
gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Katz_v._United_States
influenced future rulings Fourth Amendment rights |
gptkbp:public_perception |
Justice Moreno
|
gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:People_v._Mc_Gaughran
|
gptkbp:significance |
Fourth Amendment interpretation
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of |
physical evidence
|
gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2006
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Illinois_Supreme_Court
gptkb:New_York_Supreme_Court gptkb:Blakely_v._Washington |
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|