Statements (60)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:appeals_to |
gptkb:2021
insufficient evidence defendant's appeal |
gptkbp:argued_on |
lack of intent
|
gptkbp:case_analysis |
legal implications
California case law self-defense laws in California |
gptkbp:case_number |
criminal appeal
assault charges B295123 |
gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:majority_opinion
upheld conviction evidence admissibility self-defense justification sufficient evidence future legal cases affirmed lower court sufficient evidence for conviction upheld conviction on appeal |
gptkbp:case_significance |
self-defense laws
criminal defense |
gptkbp:clinical_trial |
jury trial
|
gptkbp:consequences |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
self-defense People of the State of California Mc Cullough |
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2020
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
Judge Doe
|
gptkbp:doctrine |
reasonable doubt
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Mc Cullough
|
gptkbp:impact |
future cases
|
gptkbp:involved |
criminal law
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
2020 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1234
|
gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
beyond a reasonable doubt
|
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Smith
guilty |
gptkbp:judicial_review |
gptkb:majority_opinion
appellate court |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
gptkbp:legal_context |
California criminal law
|
gptkbp:legal_framework |
gptkb:California_Penal_Code
|
gptkbp:legal_issue |
malice aforethought
evidentiary rulings |
gptkbp:legal_outcome |
affirmed
conviction affirmed |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
self-defense
|
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:lawyer
public defender case law review case law implications |
gptkbp:outcome |
conviction upheld
|
gptkbp:precedent |
self-defense case law
California case law |
gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:People_v._Smith
|
gptkbp:sentence |
10 years imprisonment
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of |
witness testimony
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Blakely_v._Washington
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|