|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
insufficient evidence
defendant appealed conviction
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
lack of intent
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
legal scholars
criminal defense
legal implications
evidence sufficiency
criminal law students
2020 appeal
|
|
gptkbp:case_law_reference
|
California case law
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
court records
trial court proceedings
appellate decision
B295123
California legal database
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
gptkb:majority_opinion
gptkb:legal_case
legal experts
affirmed
future cases
affirmed lower court
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
criminal justice precedent
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
criminal appeal
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
evidence evaluation
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
gptkb:legal_case
People of the State of California
Jorge Cardenas
|
|
gptkbp:criminal_charge
|
assault
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
January 2020
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2020
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:none
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
March 2020
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
People v. Cardenas
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
California criminal law
|
|
gptkbp:involved
|
criminal law
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
gptkb:California_Appellate_Reports
2020 WL 1234567
|
|
gptkbp:is_standardized_by
|
reasonable doubt
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
three judges
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
appellate review
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:California
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
gptkb:California_Penal_Code
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
sufficiency of evidence
intent established
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
upheld conviction
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
burden of proof
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
public defender
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
conviction upheld
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
California case law
|
|
gptkbp:public_interest
|
high profile case
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of
|
testimonial evidence
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Illinois_Supreme_Court
gptkb:Blakely_v._Washington
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|