|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:category
|
LGBT history in the United States
1958 in United States case law
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:355_U.S._371
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1958-01-13
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Pro-homosexual writing is not inherently obscene and is protected by the First Amendment.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
ONE, Inc. v. Olesen
|
|
gptkbp:lowerAward
|
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
|
|
gptkbp:lowerCourtDecision
|
Affirmed the district court's ruling that the magazine was obscene
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:ONE,_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:publishedIn
|
gptkb:ONE:_The_Homosexual_Magazine
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Roth_v._United_States
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Otto_Olesen
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
First U.S. Supreme Court ruling to address free speech rights of homosexual publications
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
LGBT rights
freedom of speech
obscenity law
|
|
gptkbp:SupremeCourtAction
|
Per curiam reversal of lower court
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:ONE,_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|