Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC

GPTKB entity

Statements (45)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instance_of gptkb:legal_case
gptkbp:case_types Constitutional law case
Summary available in legal databases
Arguments presented by both sides
Detailed in Supreme Court records
No. 99-404
gptkbp:decided_by gptkb:legal_case
June 25, 2000
gptkbp:historical_debate April 25, 2000
gptkbp:historical_significance Influenced future campaign finance legislation
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC
gptkbp:impact Political campaign financing laws
gptkbp:is_cited_in gptkb:528_U._S._377_(2000)
gptkbp:is_involved_in gptkb:Governor_Bob_Nixon
gptkb:Shrink_Missouri_Government_PAC
gptkbp:judicial_review Judicial scrutiny of campaign finance laws
gptkbp:legal_issue Campaign finance regulation
Campaign finance reform debates
Constitutional validation of contribution limits
Reflects judicial philosophy on free speech
gptkbp:legislation gptkb:Bipartisan_Campaign_Reform_Act
gptkb:Federal_Election_Campaign_Act
gptkbp:material Background on Missouri's campaign finance laws
gptkbp:notable_event gptkb:Citizens_United_v._FEC
gptkb:Mc_Cutcheon_v._FEC
gptkbp:outcome Affirmed lower court ruling
Analyzed in law reviews
Relevant to ongoing debates on campaign finance
Influenced state-level campaign finance laws
Court ruled that limits on campaign contributions are constitutional
Constitutional limits on contributions upheld
Impact on political donations
Significant for First Amendment rights
Significant for campaign finance law
Upheld contribution limits
gptkbp:precedent Subsequent campaign finance cases
Set precedent for contribution limits
gptkbp:public_perception gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
Mixed reactions from political groups
gptkbp:related_to Missouri campaign finance laws
gptkbp:scholarly_analysis Discussed in political science literature
gptkbp:significance First Amendment implications
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Citizens_United_v._FEC
gptkbp:bfsLayer 4