Statements (97)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:legal_case
Constitutional law case 13-402 Advocates for free speech |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:date |
October 8, 2013
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
April 2, 2014 |
| gptkbp:diplomatic_relations |
Influenced political campaign strategies
Debate on campaign finance reform Regulation of political donations |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
13-402
|
| gptkbp:economic_impact |
Influence of money in politics
Encouraged larger donations |
| gptkbp:election_year |
5-4 decision
|
| gptkbp:feedback |
Dissenting view on corruption
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
October 8, 2013
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Shift in campaign finance landscape
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Mc Cutcheon v. FEC
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Increased individual contribution limits
Influenced campaign finance laws |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
572 U. S. 185 (2014)
|
| gptkbp:is_criticized_for |
Majority view on free speech
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Shaun_Mc_Cutcheon
gptkb:Federal_Election_Commission |
| gptkbp:issues |
Aggregate limits on individual contributions to political candidates
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Constitutional review
Constitutionality of campaign finance laws |
| gptkbp:legacy |
Influence on Supreme Court's approach to campaign finance
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Campaign finance law
Libertarian principles Campaign finance limits Political campaign financing Conservative interpretation Campaign finance reform debates Free speech vs. corruption Political Action Committees (PA Cs) Expanded rights for individual donors |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
First Amendment implications
Political equality concerns |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Federal_Election_Campaign_Act
Campaign finance reform proposals |
| gptkbp:material |
Challenge to contribution limits
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Mc_Connell_v._FEC
gptkb:Buckley_v._Valeo gptkb:American_Tradition_Partnership_v._Bullock |
| gptkbp:outcome |
5-4 ruling
Landmark decision Influence on future elections Struck down aggregate contribution limits Majority opinion favored individual rights Aggregate limits unconstitutional Concerns over political inequality Expanded political spending rights Changed campaign finance regulations Implications for political spending Majority opinion favored individual contributions Ongoing discussions on electoral reform Potential for increased campaign spending Changed contribution dynamics Dissent focused on potential corruption Encouraged legal challenges to contribution limits Heightened focus on political donations Increased scrutiny on campaign finance laws Reinforced individual donor influence |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Citizens_United_v._FEC
Influenced future cases Expanded political contributions |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
gptkb:4 gptkb:5 gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer 5-4 Controversial decision Aggregate limits violate free speech Controversial ruling Critics of deregulated campaign finance Concern over corruption risks Shift in campaign finance landscape Aggregate limits are necessary Aggregate limits are unconstitutional Risk of corruption |
| gptkbp:related_to |
First Amendment rights
|
| gptkbp:responds_to |
gptkb:Federal_Election_Commission
|
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Impact on democracy
Influence of money in politics Debate on free speech and money in politics |
| gptkbp:signatories |
gptkb:Shaun_Mc_Cutcheon
|
| gptkbp:significance |
First Amendment rights
Expanded political spending rights |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission gptkb:Citizens_United_v._FEC gptkb:Mc_Donald_v._City_of_Chicago |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|