New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Co. v. United States

GPTKB entity

Statements (51)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf court case
gptkbp:applicationNumber No. 1
gptkbp:caseOutcome influenced economic policies
promoted fair trade practices
affected business practices
encouraged competition in the market
influenced regulatory policies
led to increased scrutiny of corporations
shaped public policy on monopolies
shaped_the_landscape_of_U.S._transportation_law
gptkbp:caseTypes No. 1
antitrust case
gptkbp:court gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
affirmed lower court ruling
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
April 7, 1941
gptkbp:filedIn March 3, 1941
gptkbp:historicalContext Great Depression
New_Deal_policies
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Co. v. United States
gptkbp:impact railroad industry regulations
gptkbp:influencedBy economic conditions of the time
public opinion on monopolies
gptkbp:involved gptkb:New_York_Central_&_Hudson_River_Railroad_Company
gptkb:United_States_government
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black
upheld antitrust regulations
reviewed_by_the_Supreme_Court
gptkbp:legalStatus antitrust laws
shaped future antitrust enforcement
enforcement of antitrust laws
312 U.S. 577
monopolistic_practices
attorneys_for_the_United_States
attorneys_for_New_York_Central_&_Hudson_River_Railroad_Co.
gptkbp:notableEvent Clayton Antitrust Act
Sherman Antitrust Act
gptkbp:notableFeature discussed in legal textbooks
studied in law schools
cited in legal arguments
reviewed in law journals
analyzed for antitrust implications
landmark_case_in_U.S._legal_history
gptkbp:outcome ruled against the railroad company
gptkbp:politicalParty gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter
gptkbp:precedent future antitrust cases
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:United_States_v._Southern_Pacific_Co.
gptkb:United_States_v._Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co.
gptkbp:significance impact on transportation regulation
gptkbp:yearEstablished 1941