National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie
GPTKB entity
Properties (108)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Judicial outcome favored civil liberties.
Increased public awareness of free speech issues. Assessment of public engagement in civil liberties discussions. Analysis of judicial precedents in civil liberties. Assessment of the impact of judicial review on free speech. Analysis of civic responses to hate speech. Analysis of judicial impact on free speech. Assessment of judicial impacts on free speech. Assessment of public discourse on hate speech. Civic engagement in response to the ruling. Impact of judicial review on free speech. Impact on civic responses to hate speech. Impact on local laws regarding protests. Impact on the legal framework of free speech. Judicial impact on future free speech cases. Opposed by community leaders. Public debate on hate speech. Public discourse on hate speech and free speech. Public perception of hate speech. Assessment of the impact of legal frameworks on free speech. Analysis of public engagement in civil liberties discussions. Assessment of judicial precedents in civil liberties. Analysis of the impact of legal frameworks on free speech. Public engagement in discussions of civil liberties. The_National_Socialist_Party_was_allowed_to_march. The_march_was_protected_under_the_First_Amendment. |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Not applicable.
Analysis of civic engagement in response to the ruling. Analysis of legal debates on free speech. Analysis of legal scholarship on civil liberties. Analysis of public discourse on hate speech. Assessment of civic responses to hate speech. Assessment of legal debates on free speech. Educational value in law schools. Judicial review process emphasized free speech. Assessment of legal scholarship on civil liberties. Assessment of civic engagement in response to the ruling. |
| gptkbp:community_involvement |
Skokie_residents_were_largely_opposed_to_the_march.
|
| gptkbp:court |
The ruling was a landmark decision.
Gained national attention. The decision was made to allow the march. Supreme_Court_case. |
| gptkbp:culturalImpact |
Cultural impact on perceptions of free speech.
Assessment of cultural impacts on free speech discussions. Analysis of cultural impacts on free speech discussions. |
| gptkbp:culturalSignificance |
Cultural significance in discussions of free speech.
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:events |
Public demonstration.
|
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
Influenced local ordinances on public demonstrations.
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Post-World War II America.
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Historical significance in civil rights.
Historical context of civil rights movements. |
| gptkbp:homeGround |
The Village sought to prevent the march.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced future free speech cases.
|
| gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:National_Socialist_Party_of_America
Village of Skokie |
| gptkbp:judges |
The march was allowed to proceed.
The opinion stressed the importance of free expression. Some justices dissented on the grounds of public safety. The_Supreme_Court_upheld_the_right_to_free_speech. The_case_was_reviewed_by_the_Supreme_Court. |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
Set a legal precedent for future cases involving hate speech. Clear and present danger test. The ruling emphasized the protection of unpopular speech. First_Amendment_rights First_Amendment_protections. Significant_for_First_Amendment_jurisprudence. |
| gptkbp:localLegends |
Legal_scholarship_on_First_Amendment_rights.
|
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:Skokie,_Illinois
|
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
Extensive media coverage.
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Supported by civil liberties organizations.
Documented in legal textbooks. Relevant to discussions on civil liberties. Highlighted tensions between free speech and community safety. Analysis of free speech limits. Criticized for allowing hate speech. Judgment favored free speech. Judicial significance in civil liberties. The arguments centered on free speech. Involved_a_planned_march_by_a_neo-Nazi_group. Judicial_review_emphasized_First_Amendment_rights. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
The_court_ruled_in_favor_of_the_National_Socialist_Party.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Established that free speech is protected even for hate groups.
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Debate on the limits of free speech.
Controversial and widely protested. |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Cohen_v._California
gptkb:Brandenburg_v._Ohio Public safety concerns. Freedom of assembly. Hate speech regulations. Implications for future hate speech cases. Legal_context_of_the_First_Amendment. |
| gptkbp:servicesProvided |
Civic response to the ruling.
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Set a precedent for free speech rights.
|
| gptkbp:team |
Legacy of protecting free speech.
Legal implications for future cases. Analysis of the legal framework for free speech. Judicial precedent for civil liberties. Legal debate on the limits of free speech. Legal outcome favored the march. Legal precedent for future hate speech rulings. Part of the legal framework for free speech. Legal_analysis_of_First_Amendment_implications. |
| gptkbp:typeOf |
Hate speech
|
| gptkbp:year |
1977
|