Murray v. Giarratano

GPTKB entity

Statements (59)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instance_of gptkb:legal_case
gptkbp:case_types 89-202
capital punishment case
gptkbp:court gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
gptkbp:decided_by gptkb:legal_case
June 20, 1990
gptkbp:historical_debate March 27, 1990
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Murray v. Giarratano
gptkbp:impact influenced state laws
led to legal reforms
influenced Supreme Court decisions
affected inmate rights advocacy
affecting the rights of inmates
shaped legal representation standards
gptkbp:is_cited_in 492 U. S. 1
gptkbp:is_standardized_by ineffective assistance of counsel
gptkbp:jurisdiction gptkb:United_States_federal_law
gptkbp:legal_issue due process rights
right to counsel
death penalty cases
right to effective assistance
state's interest in finality
gptkbp:legal_representation pro se representation
gptkbp:legislation gptkb:legal_case
fair trial rights
constitutional rights
habeas corpus
post-conviction relief
gptkbp:notable_event gptkb:Faretta_v._California
gptkb:Martinez_v._Ryan
gptkbp:outcome gptkb:John_Murray
gptkb:Robert_Giarratano
5-4 decision
analyzed by legal scholars
debated in legal forums
discussed in law reviews
examined in constitutional law courses
studied in law schools
cited in legal arguments
influenced future legal standards
analyzed in legal textbooks
reviewed in legal journals
discussed in public policy debates
referenced in legal seminars
examined in court opinions
analyzed in criminal law courses
upheld state discretion
denied the right to counsel for state post-conviction proceedings
reaffirmed state control over post-conviction processes
gptkbp:precedent gptkb:Strickland_v._Washington
limited rights for post-conviction counsel
gptkbp:public_perception gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'_Connor
gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun
emphasized need for counsel
focused on procedural issues
gptkbp:significance clarified the role of counsel in post-conviction proceedings
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Kowalski_v._Tesmer
gptkb:Shaw_v._Murphy
gptkbp:bfsLayer 6