Kowalski v. Tesmer

GPTKB entity

Statements (61)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instance_of gptkb:legal_case
gptkbp:argued_on gptkb:Thomas_J._G._Mc_Carthy
gptkb:Michael_A._Mc_Ginnis
November 2003
gptkbp:case_number reviewed by Supreme Court
examined in legal studies
influenced subsequent rulings
discussed in law reviews
impact on legal standards
shaped future legal arguments
analyzed in legal textbooks
cited in legal literature
referenced in court opinions
oral arguments presented
appealed from state court
dissenting opinions noted
02-1234
briefs submitted by both parties
decided by majority opinion
decision announced in 2004
influenced public perception of legal rights
notable for its implications
noteworthy for its legal reasoning
part of legal curriculum
gptkbp:case_types civil rights case
gptkbp:court gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
gptkbp:decided_by gptkb:2004
reversed
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion gptkb:Justice_Rehnquist
gptkb:Justice_Thomas
gptkb:Justice_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_O'_Connor
gptkbp:docket_number 03-1007
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Kowalski v. Tesmer
gptkbp:impact habeas corpus law
gptkbp:involved_parties gptkb:Kowalski
Tesmer
gptkbp:is_cited_in 543 U. S. 125
gptkbp:judges gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'_Connor
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkbp:jurisdiction gptkb:United_States_federal_law
gptkbp:legal_issue habeas corpus
gptkbp:legal_outcome reversal of lower court ruling
gptkbp:legal_principle ineffective assistance of counsel
gptkbp:legal_representation public defender
private attorney
gptkbp:opinion_by gptkb:Justice_Ginsburg
gptkbp:outcome affirmed lower court's decision
gptkbp:precedent established standards for habeas corpus petitions
future habeas corpus cases
gptkbp:related_cases gptkb:Murray_v._Giarratano
gptkb:Strickland_v._Washington
gptkbp:significance affirms right to effective counsel
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Seventh_Circuit
gptkbp:bfsLayer 5