Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm

URI: https://gptkb.org/entity/Motor_Vehicle_Manufacturers_Association_v._State_Farm
GPTKB entity
Statements (26)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs gptkb:State_Farm_v._Motor_Vehicle_Manufacturers_Association
gptkbp:arguedDate 1982-12-07
gptkbp:citation 463 U.S. 29
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
gptkbp:country gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date 1983-06-24
gptkbp:decision NHTSA's rescission of the passive restraint requirement was arbitrary and capricious.
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkbp:docketNumber 81-2393
gptkbp:heldBy An agency must provide a reasoned analysis for rescinding a rule, not just for enacting one.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm
gptkbp:judge gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:legalSubject Administrative law
Arbitrary and capricious standard
Judicial review of agency action
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkbp:predecessor arbitrary and capricious review standard
gptkbp:relatedLegislation gptkb:Administrative_Procedure_Act
gptkbp:relatedTo gptkb:National_Highway_Traffic_Safety_Administration
passive restraint systems
seat belt regulation
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:United_States_federal_administrative_law
gptkbp:bfsLayer 6