Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.
GPTKB entity
Statements (63)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Constitutional validity upheld
Business_operations_in_Minnesota |
gptkbp:caseTypes |
Constitutional law case
|
gptkbp:citedBy |
449 U.S. 456
|
gptkbp:controversy |
Consumer protection
Environmental concerns |
gptkbp:court |
5-4 ruling
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 21, 1981 |
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.
|
gptkbp:impact |
Commercial speech regulation
|
gptkbp:industry |
Dairy industry
|
gptkbp:judges |
Justice Harry Blackmun
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Clover_Leaf_Creamery_Company
State of Minnesota Commercial speech doctrine Constitutionality of a state law First_Amendment_rights |
gptkbp:notableEvent |
gptkb:Minnesota_Statute_325D.43
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
Judicial authority
Constitutional interpretation Consumer rights Judicial review Regulatory compliance Legal framework Legal precedents Market competition Legal challenges Commercial interests Legal precedent Public interest Regulatory authority Economic impact Judicial decisions Legal implications Legal standards Legal interpretations Legal reasoning Judicial precedents Public health concerns Judicial interpretations State interests Judicial outcomes Legal doctrines Judicial reasoning Constitutional law principles Judicial standards Legal outcomes State versus federal authority Influence on state regulations Judicial principles Balancing test First_Amendment_implications |
gptkbp:outcome |
Law upheld
|
gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
|
gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent commercial speech cases
|
gptkbp:publicAccess |
Environmental sustainability
Consumer choice Regulation of packaging |
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Central_Hudson_Gas_&_Electric_Corp._v._Public_Service_Commission
|
gptkbp:state |
gptkb:Minnesota
|