|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1964-02-17
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
377 U.S. 201
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_Arthur_Goldberg
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1964-05-18
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Byron_White
gptkb:Justice_John_Marshall_Harlan_II
gptkb:Justice_Tom_C._Clark
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
199
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
Winston Massiah v. United States
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The government may not deliberately elicit incriminating statements from a defendant after the right to counsel has attached.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Massiah v. United States
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
nan
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Winston_Massiah
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
Sixth Amendment jurisprudence
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
gptkb:Sixth_Amendment_right_to_counsel
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Miranda_v._Arizona
gptkb:Escobedo_v._Illinois
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Criminal_procedure
Right to counsel
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Sixth_Amendment_right_to_counsel
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
8
|