Maryland v. King

URI: https://gptkb.org/entity/Maryland_v._King

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate	February 26, 2013
gptkbp:citation	gptkb:569_U.S._435
gptkbp:country	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date	June 3, 2013
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Antonin_Scalia gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkbp:docketNumber	12-207
gptkbp:fullName	gptkb:Maryland_v._King
gptkbp:heldBy	The Fourth Amendment allows police to collect and analyze DNA from people arrested, but not yet convicted, of serious crimes.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Maryland v. King
gptkbp:judge	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:legalSubject	gptkb:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution Search and seizure DNA collection
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:John_Roberts gptkb:Clarence_Thomas gptkb:Samuel_Alito gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:petitioner	gptkb:State_of_Maryland
gptkbp:precedentSet	DNA collection from arrestees is constitutional under certain circumstances
gptkbp:reargued	no
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:District_Attorney's_Office_v._Osborne gptkb:Schmerber_v._California
gptkbp:response	gptkb:Alonzo_Jay_King,_Jr.
gptkbp:year	2013
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkbp:bfsLayer	5