District Attorney's Office v. Osborne

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:citation	557 U.S. 52
gptkbp:date	June 18, 2009
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:David_Souter gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:docketNumber	08-6
gptkbp:heldBy	There is no constitutional right to obtain post-conviction access to the state's evidence for DNA testing.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	District Attorney's Office v. Osborne
gptkbp:location	gptkb:Alaska
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:Antonin_Scalia gptkb:Clarence_Thomas gptkb:Samuel_Alito Chief Justice John Roberts
gptkbp:petitioner	gptkb:District_Attorney's_Office_for_the_Third_Judicial_District
gptkbp:predecessor	post-conviction DNA access cases
gptkbp:relatedTo	right to access evidence
gptkbp:response	gptkb:William_G._Osborne
gptkbp:subject	criminal procedure due process post-conviction DNA testing
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Maryland_v._King
gptkbp:bfsLayer	6